A New Standard for AI Transparency: AIBOM

The concept of an AIBOM is still in its early stages, and it is not yet a recognised standard. However, its potential impact on security, compliance, and supply chain management is undeniable. With AI systems influencing critical decisions in finance, healthcare, and security, organisations need a structured way to document and track their AI components. As global efforts to standardise AI governance progress, adopting AIBOM practices early could provide a competitive advantage in the evolving AI landscape. 

An Artificial Intelligence Bill of Materials (AIBOM) provides a comprehensive inventory of an AI system’s components. It includes critical details such as model architecture, training data sources, software dependencies, and hardware specifications. While a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) documents the software components of an application, or a Cryptography Bill of Materials (CBOM) provides an inventory of cryptographic elements,  an AIBOM focuses specifically on AI systems, detailing the unique elements that influence their functionality, transparency, and security. 

Regulators and policymakers are accelerating efforts to enhance AI transparency. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has outlined a framework for AI supply chain security, introducing an extensible Bill of Materials (xBOM) to standardise documentation across AI and other digital systems. Meanwhile, the European Union has made strides with the AI Act, which includes provisions for increased AI accountability. Similarly, China introduced regulatory measures targeting AI governance, pushing for greater transparency in model development and deployment. These global initiatives signal a shift towards standardised governance frameworks that mitigate AI-related risks while fostering responsible innovation. 

In the private sector, the demand for AIBOMs is growing as businesses face heightened scrutiny over AI model transparency, data privacy, and compliance. Companies in regulated industries, such as finance and healthcare, are recognising the value of standardised yet adaptable AIBOM frameworks to meet evolving regulatory requirements.

For example, major banks are now required to document AI models used for credit risk assessments, ensuring compliance with fair lending practices. In the healthcare sector, AI-powered diagnostics must maintain detailed records of training data and decision-making processes to meet regulatory standards. 

Beyond regulatory compliance, AIBOMs could also play a crucial role in reputational and operational risks. With increasing public awareness of AI bias, ethical concerns, and security vulnerabilities, companies that fail to implement transparency measures may face backlash from both consumers and stakeholders. By proactively adopting AIBOM practices, organisations can strengthen trust in their AI-driven solutions, demonstrating a commitment to responsible and ethical AI development. 

The challenge remains in achieving industry-wide standardisation. AIBOMs are not yet a formal requirement, but as AI governance becomes a corporate imperative, organisations that integrate AIBOM principles today will be better positioned for future regulatory changes and risk management strategies. 

The question is no longer whether AIBOMs will become a standard, but when.  

 Contact us to learn how SCANOSS can support your AI governance strategy.